The Washington–Moscow Hotline is one of those Cold War stories that everyone thinks they know, but almost nobody really understands. Ask most people and they will tell you about a red phone, sitting on the president’s desk, ready to ring in the dead of night. The president picks it up, and the voice on the other end is a Soviet premier warning that the missiles are flying. That image is iconic. It is also false. There was never a red phone to Moscow. The Hotline existed, but it was a very different system than the one of popular imagination. It was a tool of caution and discipline, not theatrics. And for sixty years, it has quietly done its job, often in the background of history.
The idea of a direct communication line between Washington and Moscow predates the Cuban Missile Crisis, although it was that terrifying October in 1962 that forced the world to finally take the idea seriously. As early as 1954, Soviet officials were already talking about a direct channel to avoid misunderstandings that could spiral into war. In 1958, the economist and nuclear strategist Thomas Schelling raised the same idea in the United States. Schelling, who thought deeply about nuclear brinkmanship, understood that miscommunication was just as dangerous as actual hostile intent. Around the same time, fiction was warning about the same risks. Peter Bryant’s novel Red Alert appeared in 1958. The book told the story of a nuclear war set off by accidents and bad communication, and Stanley Kubrick would later adapt it into the satirical film Dr. Strangelove. These works helped shape public imagination.
In 1960, Jess Gorkin, editor of Parade magazine, published an open letter to President Eisenhower and Premier Khrushchev that ended with the line, “Must a world be lost for want of a telephone call?” Gorkin understood the fragility of Cold War communication and tried to prod leaders into doing something about it. But bureaucrats and generals resisted. The State Department did not like the idea of presidents freelancing behind their backs. The Pentagon did not want Moscow to have a line straight into the White House. For the moment, the idea of a direct connection was shelved.
That hesitation nearly ended in catastrophe in 1962. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Khrushchev’s first long message to Washington took nearly twelve hours to arrive and be decoded. By the time Kennedy’s team had written and edited a reply, a second, harder message had already come in from Moscow. The crisis escalated with each passing hour. Under severe time pressure, the two sides resorted to signaling through public speeches and press leaks. Television networks carried hints that became part of the negotiation process. It was no way to prevent the end of the world.
When the crisis passed, Kennedy and Khrushchev recognized the obvious. They needed a better way. On June 20, 1963, in Geneva, representatives of the United States and the Soviet Union signed the “Hot Line Agreement.” The official American name was the Direct Communications Link. Inside the Pentagon, technicians who had to run it called it MOLINK, short for “Moscow Link.” By August the system was up and running. On August 30, 1963, the first test messages were sent.
Those first exchanges said much about the two countries. Washington sent a test string familiar to every secretary and typist in America, “The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog’s back 1234567890.” It was a pangram, a sentence that used every letter of the alphabet, along with the digits. Moscow’s reply was something quite different, a description of the sunset over Moscow written in poetic language. From the very beginning, the Hotline was as much about culture as about crisis.
The system was not a telephone. It was a teletype circuit. The United States installed Model 28 ASR teleprinters in Moscow. The Soviets sent East German built T-63 Cyrillic teleprinters to Washington. Each side used its own alphabet and language, and translation was handled at the receiving end. To keep the line secure, both sides used cipher machines from Norway known as the ETCRRM II, which employed the one time pad system of encryption. Each country prepared its own key tapes and delivered them through its embassy. Properly used, this method was unbreakable. Neither side had to reveal its own top secret encryption systems, because the Norwegian equipment was commercially available.
The routing was complicated. The primary line ran from Washington under the Atlantic through the TAT-1 cable to London, then north through Copenhagen, Stockholm, and Helsinki before reaching Moscow. A backup radio circuit ran from Washington to Tangier in Morocco, then on to Moscow. The system was reliable but far from perfect. On more than one occasion, a Danish bulldozer or a Finnish farmer accidentally cut the cable. There were even reports of fires in Baltimore damaging parts of the system. The vulnerabilities were obvious, but the line worked.
There was a reason the system was text only. The first was caution. Written words forced both sides to pause and reflect before responding. A telephone could lead to hasty remarks and misunderstandings. The second reason was technical. In the early 1960s, secure voice encryption at the necessary level simply did not exist. The third reason was linguistic. Written Russian and English could be carefully translated by experts. Oral conversations required instant interpreters, with all the risks of nuance and mishearing. A text based system may have been slower, but it was more deliberate, and in nuclear diplomacy deliberate was exactly what was needed.
On the American side, the main hub was in the National Military Command Center, the NMCC, located in the basement of the Pentagon. Six teams of two people each worked in shifts around the clock. Each team was led by a Presidential Translator, a commissioned officer fluent in Russian and briefed on world affairs. Their job was to receive messages, translate them, and transmit replies. When a real message from Moscow arrived, the doors of the terminal room were locked, and the translator reported directly to the President.
In 1967, Robert McNamara, then Secretary of Defense, discovered to his irritation that Hotline messages ended at the Pentagon and did not go directly to the White House. He ordered an immediate patch. Soon there was a terminal in the White House Communications Agency facility in the East Wing basement. Messages could then be sent to the Situation Room, originally by pneumatic tube, and later by data link. That White House terminal had privacy and override features, meaning it could cut off other terminals if the President needed direct use. Other backup terminals were established at the Alternate National Military Command Center inside Raven Rock Mountain and at the State Department. At the President’s discretion, more could be created, but even the existence of such backups was classified.
The Hotline did not stay frozen in 1963 technology. By the 1970s it was clear that satellites offered more security and flexibility than vulnerable undersea cables. In 1971, Washington and Moscow agreed to upgrade the system. By 1978, two satellite circuits were in place. The Americans used the Intelsat system, and the Soviets used Molniya II satellites. Earth stations were built in Maryland and West Virginia for the American side, and in Moscow and Vladimir for the Soviet side. The Tangier radio circuit was shut down, though the landline remained as a backup.
In 1980, new equipment replaced the old teletype units. Siemens M-190 encryption machines took over from the ETCRRM II. In 1984, Ronald Reagan proposed adding facsimile capability. The Soviets agreed, and by 1988 fax machines were carrying the traffic. This was faster, more flexible, and allowed transmission of charts, maps, photographs, and even handwritten notes. One famous example was a thirteen page handwritten letter from Mikhail Gorbachev to Reagan. The system also included IBM personal computers for coordination. Encryption continued to use the Vernam stream cipher, with key data stored on floppy disks. Once the fax links proved reliable, the old teletype machines were turned off.
The final major upgrade came in 2008. A secure computer network linking Moscow and Washington began operation on January 1 of that year. It uses satellites and fiber optic cables and runs commercial software for both chat and e-mail. The chat is for coordination between operators, and the e-mail is for the actual messages. Delivery is essentially instantaneous. The Hotline, now in its fifth technological generation, remains active today.
What has it actually been used for? The first reported American use was on November 22, 1963, the day of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, to reassure the Soviets that no conspiracy was involved. The first Soviet use came on June 5, 1967, during the Six Day War, to clarify fleet movements. Since then it has been employed during many international crises, including the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, the Yom Kippur War of 1973, the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, the threat of a Soviet move into Poland in 1981, the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, the Gulf War in 1991, and the Iraq War in 2003. In October 2016, President Obama used the Hotline to warn Moscow not to interfere with the upcoming election.
Not every crisis saw the Hotline used. In 1979 a false alarm at NORAD suggested a Soviet nuclear strike. The Hotline was not used. During NATO’s Able Archer exercise in 1983, when the Soviets feared a surprise Western attack, the Hotline also remained silent. That fact has fueled debate among historians. The Hotline was there, but it was still only as good as the willingness of leaders to pick it up and use it.
It was not always about emergencies. Lyndon Johnson used the Hotline to inform the Soviets about Apollo missions. Jimmy Carter once sent Brezhnev a personal note, which Moscow thought was an improper use of the system. Ronald Reagan reportedly used it to complain about the arrest of an American journalist, Nicholas Daniloff, in 1986. George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin used it to discuss rebuilding Iraq in 2003. Alongside these messages, operators sent daily test transmissions. The Americans liked to send Shakespeare, Mark Twain, encyclopedias, even first aid manuals. The Soviets sent Chekhov and Russian poetry. Both sides took care to avoid accidental insult. Operators avoided sending Winnie the Pooh, for example, since the bear might be read as a jab at Russia.
Despite all this, the myth of the red phone refuses to die. Hollywood entrenched it in the public mind, and politicians sometimes joke about it. Even government officials have been known to assume the Hotline was a telephone. Real red phones did exist in Washington, but they were part of secure internal military networks like the Defense Red Switch. None of them connected to Moscow.
The Hotline was never about drama. It was about restraint. The people who designed it understood that in a nuclear age, what mattered was not quick reactions but careful communication. A written message could be translated with precision and considered with calm reflection. A spoken word could be misunderstood, mistranslated, or blurted out in anger. The very nature of the Hotline was to slow things down just enough to keep tempers and errors from setting off catastrophe.
From 1963 to today, the Hotline has evolved from clattering teletypes to humming servers. It has been routed through undersea cables, satellites, fax lines, and fiber optics. It has carried messages in times of war and in times of calm. It has been cut by farmers and bulldozers, patched by secretaries of defense, and managed by translators who knew that a misplaced word might cost the world dearly.
The red phone on the president’s desk is a fiction, but the real Hotline may have saved the world more than once. It is still there, quiet, secure, almost invisible. And in a time when miscommunication between nuclear powers could still mean disaster, that humming link remains as important as ever.
DAVE DOES HISTORY 
Leave a comment