By March of 1943, Nazi Germany was facing an existential crisis. The high tide of Hitler’s conquests had begun to recede. The German Sixth Army had been obliterated at Stalingrad in February, marking the first major, undeniable catastrophe for the Wehrmacht. Meanwhile, the Allies were gaining strength in North Africa, and the strategic bombing campaign against Germany’s cities and industrial centers was intensifying. Faith in Hitler’s infallibility was beginning to erode, particularly within the military’s professional officer corps. Among them was a growing faction of disillusioned men who saw Hitler’s leadership not as Germany’s salvation, but as its doom. The German resistance was not a monolithic movement. It was fractured, hesitant, and riddled with contradictions. Many conspirators, including officers like Colonel Henning von Tresckow and his associate Rudolf-Christoph von Gersdorff, initially believed in the war effort but later became convinced that Hitler had to be eliminated for Germany to survive. Their challenge was immense: not only did they have to kill Hitler, but they had to do so in a way that ensured the Nazi regime collapsed with him. Any misstep could (and often did) result in the immediate and brutal execution of those involved.
Listen to the Article (approx 7:30)
Rudolf-Christoph Freiherr von Gersdorff was born in 1905 to an aristocratic Prussian family. He was a career officer, molded in the traditions of the old German military elite. He joined the Reichswehr in 1923 and climbed the ranks, proving himself in combat during the invasions of Poland and France. By 1941, he was stationed on the Eastern Front as an intelligence officer attached to Army Group Center, where he became part of a growing circle of military men who recoiled in horror at the crimes committed by the SS Einsatzgruppen. Gersdorff’s moral revulsion at the atrocities he witnessed—particularly the systematic murder of Soviet prisoners and Jews—solidified his resolve to act against Hitler. His association with Colonel Henning von Tresckow, a leading figure in the military resistance, brought him deeper into the conspiracy to assassinate the dictator. By 1943, he had made up his mind: if given the opportunity, he would give his life to remove Hitler from power.
The opportunity presented itself on March 21, 1943, during an annual event known as Heroes’ Memorial Day (Heldengedenktag). This solemn occasion was meant to honor Germany’s fallen soldiers, but for Gersdorff and his co-conspirators, it was the perfect setting for an assassination attempt. Hitler, accompanied by Heinrich Himmler, Hermann Göring, and other high-ranking officials, was scheduled to visit the Zeughaus, the historic armory in Berlin, to view an exhibition of captured Soviet weaponry. Gersdorff was given a role in the event as an expert guide, allowing him to stay close to Hitler. He devised a plan that would require unimaginable courage: he would carry two bombs with ten-minute delayed fuses in his coat pockets. Once he activated them, there would be no turning back—he would die alongside Hitler in a self-sacrificial act of destruction.
On the morning of March 21, Hitler arrived at the Zeughaus as planned. The tension was unbearable. Gersdorff, sweating under the weight of his deadly cargo, waited for the right moment. As Hitler entered the exhibition hall, Gersdorff discreetly activated the fuses on his explosives. He now had ten minutes to complete his mission. The plan relied on Hitler lingering in the exhibition hall, surrounded by his entourage. But, in an unexpected move, Hitler breezed through the displays, showing little interest in the captured Soviet weaponry. Within just a few minutes, he had seen enough. Before Gersdorff could maneuver into position for a fatal embrace, Hitler abruptly turned and left the room. With the bomb still ticking away in his pocket, Gersdorff faced a new crisis: if he did nothing, he would explode alone, likely killing innocent bystanders while leaving Hitler unharmed. Acting quickly, he slipped into a nearby bathroom and managed to defuse the device with mere seconds to spare. The attempt had failed. Incredibly, no one suspected anything. Hitler, as paranoid as he was, remained blissfully unaware that he had just narrowly escaped death. Gersdorff’s extraordinary composure allowed him to walk away without drawing attention to himself, though he was swiftly transferred back to the Eastern Front, likely as a precautionary measure.
Despite the failure of the attempt, Gersdorff remained committed to the resistance. He later played a role in supplying explosives to the July 20, 1944, plot led by Claus von Stauffenberg, though he avoided arrest when that effort also failed. He survived the war, one of the few major conspirators to do so. After 1945, Gersdorff worked with the U.S. Army Historical Division, contributing to studies of German military operations. In later years, he turned to charitable work and eventually received Germany’s Grand Cross of Merit for his postwar contributions to society. His memoirs, Soldat im Untergang (Soldier During the Downfall), offer a detailed account of his wartime experiences and his moral reckoning with the crimes of the Nazi regime.
This is a question that invites debate. On one hand, he was willing to sacrifice himself in a bold attempt to rid the world of one of history’s greatest monsters. On the other, he, like many in the German officer corps, had initially supported Hitler’s war before coming to see the truth too late. Some argue that his failure to act sooner, or more decisively, complicates his legacy. But consider this: what if Gersdorff had succeeded? If Hitler had died in March 1943, the war might have taken a dramatically different course. Would the Allies have faced a fractured Germany more willing to negotiate a peace? Or would another Nazi leader, perhaps Himmler or Göring, have stepped in to continue the fight? Would millions of lives have been saved, or would the war have dragged on with even greater brutality? These are questions we can never fully answer. What we do know is that Gersdorff’s courage is undeniable. He stood against the tide of history, risking everything to stop a madman. His mission may have failed, but his willingness to act in the face of overwhelming odds secures his place among those who chose resistance over complicity.
If Rudolf-Christoph von Gersdorff’s suicide bombing had succeeded on March 21, 1943, killing Adolf Hitler and potentially other high-ranking Nazis, the trajectory of World War II could have changed dramatically. The most immediate consequence would have been a power struggle within the Nazi regime. With no clear successor, chaos could have erupted among Hitler’s inner circle. Heinrich Himmler, Hermann Göring, and Joseph Goebbels were the most likely contenders, but none commanded Hitler’s cult-like following. The possibility of an internal coup, or even a civil war among Nazi factions, could have weakened Germany’s ability to continue the war effectively.
The German military, already disillusioned after the disaster at Stalingrad, might have seized the opportunity to negotiate peace. A new leadership, recognizing the war’s unwinnable nature, could have sought terms with the Allies, potentially shortening the war by months or even years. However, Stalin and Roosevelt had already agreed on unconditional surrender, making negotiations difficult. The war might have continued, but with a weakened, less unified Nazi government.
If peace talks failed, a less erratic leader might have pursued a more strategic defense, prolonging the war. Without Hitler’s obsession with holding territory at all costs, Germany could have fought a more flexible campaign, possibly delaying the inevitable Allied victory. On the other hand, Hitler’s death might have demoralized the German people, accelerating surrender.
One certainty is that the Holocaust would have continued unless the new leadership actively halted it. Without Hitler, the ideological framework remained, and many in the Nazi hierarchy were fully committed to genocide. Ultimately, while Hitler’s death in 1943 might have shortened the war, it is less certain whether it would have prevented the immense destruction and suffering that followed.
DAVE DOES HISTORY 
Leave a comment